单选题A Some of their prisoners are allowed to study or work outside prisons.B Most of their prisoners are expected to work.C Their prisoners are often sent to special centers for skill training.D Their prisoners are allowed freedom to visit their families.

题目
单选题
A

Some of their prisoners are allowed to study or work outside prisons.

B

Most of their prisoners are expected to work.

C

Their prisoners are often sent to special centers for skill training.

D

Their prisoners are allowed freedom to visit their families.


相似考题
更多“单选题A Some of their prisoners are allowed to study or work outside prisons.B Most of their prisoners are expected to work.C Their prisoners are often sent to special centers for skill training.D Their prisoners are allowed freedom to visit their families.”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    Some experts argue that the money is well spent because ______.

    A. crime will cost more money to society

    B. the government can well afford the money

    C. the number of prisoners is not really large

    D. prisoner population decreased in the 1990s


    正确答案:A

    39.答案为A。根据第二段第一句,saying the cost of keeping prisoners behind bars doesn't seem much in comparison in the l990s coincided with a steady drop in the US crime rates作出该项选择。选项C和D与原文不符,选项B文中未提及。

  • 第2题:

    To mark this special occasion, an opening discount of 50% will be allowed on all purchases made by the first hundred customers.


    正确答案:为了庆祝这个特殊的日子,凡前100名购物的顾客将享受开业5折的优惠。

  • 第3题:

    The word 'company' in the first paragraph refers to __.

    A. companions

    B. bankers

    C. lawyers

    D. prisoners


    正确答案:A

  • 第4题:

    Prisoners were kept in the most appalling conditions.

    A: flexible
    B: terrible
    C: reasonable
    D: serious

    答案:B
    解析:
    句意:囚犯们被关在最可怕的环境中。画线单词appalling意为“骇人听闻的,可怕的”。A项flexibl意为“灵活的,易弯曲的”;B项terrible意为“可怕的”,与画线单词同义,C项reasonable意为“有道理的”;”项serious意为“严重的,认真的”。故本题选B。

  • 第5题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    DNA Testing

    DNA testing reveals the genes of each individual person.Since the early twentieth century scientists
    have known that all human characteristics are contained in a person's genes and are passed from parents to
    children.Genes work as a chemical instruction manual for each part and each function of the body.Their
    basic chemical element is called DNA,a copy of which can be found in every cell. The existence of genes
    and the chemical structure of DNA were understood by the mid-1900s,but scientists have only recently been
    able to identify a person from just a drop of blood or a single hair.
    One of the most important uses of DNA testing is in criminal investigation.The very first use of DNA
    testing in a criminal case was in 1985 in Great Britain,when a man confessed to killing a young woman in
    the English countryside.Because police had found samples of the killer's DNA at the scene of the crime,a
    biologist suggested that it might be possible to compare that DNA to some from the confessor's blood.To
    everyone's surprise,the tests showed that he was not the killer. Nor was he guilty of a similar murder that
    had happened some time earlier. At that point he admitted that he had confessed to the crimes out of fear
    and police pressure.The police then asked 5,000 local men for samples of their blood,and DNA testing
    revealed that one of them was the real murderer,so the first man was set free.
    In 1992,two law professors,Peter Neufeld and Bany Scheck,decided to use DNA evidence to help set free
    such mistakenly convicted prisoners.With the help of their students.they created a not-for-profit organization
    called the Innocence Project. Most of their clients are poor men,many from racial and ethnic minorities.In
    fact,studies have shown that U. S. judges and juries are often influenced by racial and ethnic background,and
    that people from minority groups are more likely to be convicted. Some of these men had been sentenced to
    death,a form of punishment used in thirty eight states out of fifty(as of 2006).For most of these prisoners,their
    only hope was another trial in which DNA testing could be used to prove their innocence.
    Between 1992 and 2006,the Innocence Project helped free 100 men.Some of these prisoners had been
    in jail for ten,twenty years or more for crimes they did not commit.However,the goal of the Innocence
    Project is not simply to set free those who are wrongfully in jail.They also hope to bring about real changes
    in the criminal justice system.
    Illinois in the late 1990s,a group of journalism students at Northwestern University were able to bring
    about such a change in that state.They began investigating some Illinois prisoners who claimed to be inno-
    cent. Through DNA testing,the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the
    crimes they had been accused of. Thirteen of these men were set free,and in 2000,Governor Ryan of
    Illinois decided to stop carrying out death sentences until further study could be made of the prisoners'
    cases。
    The use of DNA in criminal cases is still being debated around the world.Some fear that governments
    will one day keep records of everyone'sDNA,which could put limits on the privacy and freedom of citizens.
    Other people mistrust the science of DNA testing and think that lawyers use it to get their clients free whether
    or not they are guilty.But for those whose innocence has been proven and who are now free men,DNA
    testing has meant nothing less than a return to life.And with the careful use of DNA testing,no innocent
    person should ever be convicted again.

    What is the main idea of this passage?
    A:DNA testing has changed the American legal system.
    B:DNA testing has helped innocent men go free in Illinois.
    C:DNA testing uses genetics to identify a person.
    D:DNA testing has played a key role in criminal investigation.

    答案:D
    解析:
    文章第一段总领全文,最后一段是对全文的总结,中间其他段落通过举例说明DNA测 试法在当今犯罪侦查中起着重要的作用。
    由文章第二段第二、三句话“The very first use of DNA testing in a criminal case was in 1985 in Great Britain...Because police had found samples of the killer' s DNA...”可知答案为D。
    由文章第三段第一、二句话“In 1992...Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck, decided to use DNA evidence to help set free such mistakenly convicted prisoners…they created a not-for-profit organization called the Innocence Project.”可知答案为A。
    由文章第五段第三句话“Through DNA testing, the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the crimes they had been accused of.”中,这些学生是指西北大学 的学生,由此可知答案为A。
    本文主要讲述了DNA测试法在犯罪侦查当中起的积极作用,同时还举了例子,比如西 北大学的一些学生用DNA测试法来证明了一些人的清白。既然作者认为这种方法是有效、积 极的东西,当然是对其支持的。选项中表示支持、赞成的词为Positive,由此可以确定本题答案 为B选项。

  • 第6题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    DNA Testing

    DNA testing reveals the genes of each individual person.Since the early twentieth century scientists
    have known that all human characteristics are contained in a person's genes and are passed from parents to
    children.Genes work as a chemical instruction manual for each part and each function of the body.Their
    basic chemical element is called DNA,a copy of which can be found in every cell. The existence of genes
    and the chemical structure of DNA were understood by the mid-1900s,but scientists have only recently been
    able to identify a person from just a drop of blood or a single hair.
    One of the most important uses of DNA testing is in criminal investigation.The very first use of DNA
    testing in a criminal case was in 1985 in Great Britain,when a man confessed to killing a young woman in
    the English countryside.Because police had found samples of the killer's DNA at the scene of the crime,a
    biologist suggested that it might be possible to compare that DNA to some from the confessor's blood.To
    everyone's surprise,the tests showed that he was not the killer. Nor was he guilty of a similar murder that
    had happened some time earlier. At that point he admitted that he had confessed to the crimes out of fear
    and police pressure.The police then asked 5,000 local men for samples of their blood,and DNA testing
    revealed that one of them was the real murderer,so the first man was set free.
    In 1992,two law professors,Peter Neufeld and Bany Scheck,decided to use DNA evidence to help set free
    such mistakenly convicted prisoners.With the help of their students.they created a not-for-profit organization
    called the Innocence Project. Most of their clients are poor men,many from racial and ethnic minorities.In
    fact,studies have shown that U. S. judges and juries are often influenced by racial and ethnic background,and
    that people from minority groups are more likely to be convicted. Some of these men had been sentenced to
    death,a form of punishment used in thirty eight states out of fifty(as of 2006).For most of these prisoners,their
    only hope was another trial in which DNA testing could be used to prove their innocence.
    Between 1992 and 2006,the Innocence Project helped free 100 men.Some of these prisoners had been
    in jail for ten,twenty years or more for crimes they did not commit.However,the goal of the Innocence
    Project is not simply to set free those who are wrongfully in jail.They also hope to bring about real changes
    in the criminal justice system.
    Illinois in the late 1990s,a group of journalism students at Northwestern University were able to bring
    about such a change in that state.They began investigating some Illinois prisoners who claimed to be inno-
    cent. Through DNA testing,the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the
    crimes they had been accused of. Thirteen of these men were set free,and in 2000,Governor Ryan of
    Illinois decided to stop carrying out death sentences until further study could be made of the prisoners'
    cases。
    The use of DNA in criminal cases is still being debated around the world.Some fear that governments
    will one day keep records of everyone'sDNA,which could put limits on the privacy and freedom of citizens.
    Other people mistrust the science of DNA testing and think that lawyers use it to get their clients free whether
    or not they are guilty.But for those whose innocence has been proven and who are now free men,DNA
    testing has meant nothing less than a return to life.And with the careful use of DNA testing,no innocent
    person should ever be convicted again.

    DNA testing was first used in a criminal case by___________.
    A:a lawyer in New York
    B:students in Illinois
    C:doctors in the United States
    D:police in Great Britain

    答案:D
    解析:
    文章第一段总领全文,最后一段是对全文的总结,中间其他段落通过举例说明DNA测 试法在当今犯罪侦查中起着重要的作用。
    由文章第二段第二、三句话“The very first use of DNA testing in a criminal case was in 1985 in Great Britain...Because police had found samples of the killer' s DNA...”可知答案为D。
    由文章第三段第一、二句话“In 1992...Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck, decided to use DNA evidence to help set free such mistakenly convicted prisoners…they created a not-for-profit organization called the Innocence Project.”可知答案为A。
    由文章第五段第三句话“Through DNA testing, the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the crimes they had been accused of.”中,这些学生是指西北大学 的学生,由此可知答案为A。
    本文主要讲述了DNA测试法在犯罪侦查当中起的积极作用,同时还举了例子,比如西 北大学的一些学生用DNA测试法来证明了一些人的清白。既然作者认为这种方法是有效、积 极的东西,当然是对其支持的。选项中表示支持、赞成的词为Positive,由此可以确定本题答案 为B选项。

  • 第7题:

    Directions: Some people think that alluniversity students should study whatever they like. Others believe that theyshould only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, suchas those related to science and technology. What′s your view about what subjectuniversity students should study? You are required to write a compositionwithin 180 words, but no less than 150 words.


    答案:
    解析:
    People have different views about what subject university students should study, whether the one they like or only the one that will be useful in the future. People who believe students should only study subjects that will be useful in the future list several reasons. First, university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology can provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. Second, those subjects play the major role in new inventions, economic growth, and the society' s greater future prosperity. As far as I am concerned, university students should be free to choose their preferred subjects. In my opinion, students can study well if the learning content caters to their interest. Besides, the creative thinking patterns behind some theoretical subjects have potential value. In this sense, more students of art, history and philosophy are needed. In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for students to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally assert that they have the right to study whatever they like.

  • 第8题:

    Directions: Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. What′s your view about what subject university students should study? You are required to write a composition within 180 words, but no less than 150 words.


    答案:
    解析:
    People have different views about what subject university students should study, whether the one they like or only the one that will be useful in the future. People who believe students should only study subjects that will be useful in the future list several reasons. First, university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology can provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. Second, those subjects play the major role in new inventions, economic growth, and the society' s greater future prosperity. As far as I am concerned, university students should be free to choose their preferred subjects. In my opinion, students can study well if the learning content caters to their interest. Besides, the creative thinking patterns behind some theoretical subjects have potential value. In this sense, more students of art, history and philosophy are needed. In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for students to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally assert that they have the right to study whatever they like.

  • 第9题:

    We may draw a conclusion that_______during a war.

    A.the Red Cross only protects the wounded
    B.the Red Cross only helps prisoners of war
    C.the Red Cross only helps citizens
    D.the Red Cross helps all the people in need no matter which side they are fighting for

    答案:D
    解析:

  • 第10题:

    单选题
    A

    To show how prisoners are now making the rules in the city’s jails.

    B

    To explain that the racial divisions of the country are reflected in local jails.

    C

    To prove that local jails are more dangerous than the state or federal jails.

    D

    To examine why local jails house criminals of all different types.


    正确答案: A
    解析:
    录音提到“Unfortunately, in local jails, criminals committing all levels of offense are housed in the same facilities and are often separated to avoid violence ...”以及“The LA County jail has a history of prisoner-on-prisoner murder”,由此可知地方监狱监禁着的各种犯罪分子比联邦监狱或州立监狱监禁着的犯罪分子更危险。
    【听力原文】
      Now, as we discussed last class, our current system of prisons is a legacy of the history of the nature of penal reform and the attempts at social reform at all levels of society in the 1960s. Currently, we have three types of prisons: federal, state, and local. Federal prisons house the most dangerous criminals and those who have committed serious crimes against the government. State prisons have different levels, with maximum security housing violent offenders such as murders and rapists while minimum security prisons house large numbers of white collar and minor offenders.
      Local jails, sometimes called county jails, house people awaiting trial and those serving very short sentences for minor infractions. Unfortunately, in local jails, criminals committing all levels of offense are housed in the same facilities and are often separated to avoid violence ... This isn’t always successful. An example would be the Los Angeles County jail, which is notorious for being divided along racial lines. White, black, Hispanic, and Asian prisoners are segregated, not by official policy, but by a jailhouse policy established by the prisoners themselves. Each group has a “shot caller”, a de facto leader whose job is to represent his group in any negotiations with the others in order to keep the peace or, at times, go to war. The LA County jail has a history of prisoner-on-prisoner murder, most of which is related to the rival street gangs of the city. While crime in the nation has gone down, our prisons still have one of the largest inmate populations in the world. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of prisoners has almost doubled from 1.2 million to just over two million. It may not surprise you that most of the nation’s prisoners are males. Females account for only six percent of all prisoners. In addition, the prisoners are not representative of America’s social groups. Blacks and Hispanics comprise two thirds of the prisoners yet are less than one third of the nation’s population. This is a telling statistic concerning the social woes of our nation’s minority groups. As for the type of crime, approximately half are in jail for violent crimes, including murder, rape, robbery, and assault. Most of the remaining prisoners are in jail for property crimes, which include burglary and various types of theft. Finally, there is a large and growing group that is incarcerated for drug offenses, whether manufacturing, selling, or using drugs.
    Questions 56 to 58 are based on the passage you have just heard.
    56. What aspect of crime does the professor mainly discuss?
    57. According to the professor, what happened to the size of the prison population in America between 1990 and 2000?
    58. Why does the professor discuss the Los Angeles County jail in detail?

  • 第11题:

    单选题
    73  A  patients       B  citizens       C  prisoners      D  laborers
    A

    A

    B

    B

    C

    C

    D

    C


    正确答案: A
    解析:

  • 第12题:

    问答题
    Practice 8  In 1992, two law professors, Peter Neufeld and Barry Seheck, decided to use DNA evidence to help set free such mistakenly convicted prisoners. With the help of their students, they created a not-for-profit organization called the Innocence Project. Most of their clients are poor men, many from racial and ethnic minorities. In fact, studies have shown that U. S. judges and juries are often influenced by racial and ethnic background, and that people from minority groups are more likely to be convicted.  Between 1992 and 2006, the Innocence Project helped free 100 men. Some of these prisoners had been in jail for ten, but twenty years or more for crimes they did not commit. However, the goal of the Innocence Project is not simply to set free those who are wrongfully in jail. They also hope to bring about real changes in the criminal justice system.  Illinois in the late 1990s, a group of journalism students at Northwestern University were able to bring about such a change in that state. They began investigating some Illinois prisoners who claimed to be innocent. Through DNA testing, the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the crimes they had been accused of. Thirteen of these men were set free, and in 2000, Governor Ryan of Illinois decided to stop carrying out death sentences until further study could be made of the prisoners cases.  The use of DNA in criminal cases is still being debated around the world. Some fear that governments will one day keep records of everyone’s DNA, which could put limits on the privacy and freedom of citizens. Other people mistrust the science of DNA testing and think that lawyers use it to get their clients free whether or not they are guilty. But for those whose innocence has been proven and who are now free men. DNA testing has meant nothing less than a return to life. And with the careful use of DNA testing, no innocent person should ever be convicted again.

    正确答案:
    【参考译文】
    1992年,两位法律教授,Peter和Barry决定使用DNA证据来帮助释放那些误判的囚犯。在其学生的帮助下,他们创造了一个非营利性组织——无罪项目。他们的客户绝大多数都是穷人,许多是少数种族和少数民族。事实上,研究已经表明美国法官和陪审团往往受到种族和民族背景的影响,来自少数群体的人们更有可能被判有罪。
    在1992年到2006年之间,无罪项目已帮助100人重获自由。其中一些囚犯因为他们没有犯下的罪行坐了10年、20年甚至更久的牢。然而,无罪项目的目标不仅仅是释放那些误判的人,他们还希望能真正改变刑事司法体系。
    在二十世纪九十年代后期的伊利诺伊州,美国西北大学一群新闻系学生改变了该州的刑事司法体系。他们开始调查一些声称无辜的伊利诺伊州囚犯。通过DNA鉴定,学生得以证明囚犯事实上没有犯下他们被指控的罪行。他们中十三人无罪释放,在2000年,伊利诺伊州州长Ryan决定废除死刑,直到案情需要进一步研究。
    在刑事案件中使用DNA这件事在世界各地仍然争论不休。一些人担心政府某天会将每个人的DNA存档,这可能会限制公民隐私和自由。其他人误信了DNA鉴定的科学性,认为不管客户有没有罪,律师都利用它来使其脱离罪状。而对于那些已被证明无罪的自由人,DNA鉴定仅意味着重新回归生活。随着DNA鉴定的谨慎使用,无辜的人不应该再次被判有罪。
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第13题:

    The Germans kept those ( )in a secret place.

    A、prisoner-of-war

    B、prisoners-of-wars

    C、prisoners-of-war

    D、prisoner-of-wars


    参考答案:C

  • 第14题:

    A fetched B. allowed C. expected D. took


    正确答案:D

  • 第15题:

    How many adult life jackets are required on board a ship ________.

    A.Enough for 100 percent of the persons allowed on board

    B.One for each work station and industrial work site

    C.Enough for 150 percent of the persons allowed on board

    D.Both A & B above


    正确答案:D

  • 第16题:

    Every morning,kids from a local high school are working hard.They are making and selling special coffee at a coffee cafe.They are also making a lot of money.
    These students can make up to twelve hundred dollars a day.They are selling their special coffee to airplane passengers.After the students get paid,the rest of the money goes to helping a local youth project.
    These high school students use a space in the Oakland airport.It is usually very crowded.
    Many people who fly on the planes like to drink the special coffee.
    One customer thinks that the coffee costs a lot but it is good and worth it.Most customers are pleasant but some are unhappy.They do not like it if the coffee care is not open for business.
    The students earn$6.10 an hour plus tips.They also get school credit while they learn how to run a business.Many of the students enjoy the work although it took some time to learn how to do it.
    They have to learn how to steam milk,load the pots,and add flavor.It takes some skill and sometimes mistakes are made.The most common mistake is forgetting to add the coffee.

    Most customers are pleasant but some are unhappy because__.

    A.they don't think the skill to make coffee is necessary for students
    B.they think the cafe should be open for business
    C.they feel that the work is hard for students
    D.they think the special coffee is too expensive

    答案:B
    解析:
    从第四段可知,有些人对咖啡屋不属于纯商业而感到不满意。

  • 第17题:

    The police had to restrain the prisoners from escaping.

    A:prevent
    B:reduce
    C:disallow
    D:confine

    答案:A
    解析:
    本句意思:警察们不得不强行制止囚犯逃走。restrain意为“制止,阻止”,与prevent (环止)意思相近。reduce减少;disallow不允许;confine监禁。

  • 第18题:

    共用题干
    第一篇

    DNA Testing

    DNA testing reveals the genes of each individual person.Since the early twentieth century scientists
    have known that all human characteristics are contained in a person's genes and are passed from parents to
    children.Genes work as a chemical instruction manual for each part and each function of the body.Their
    basic chemical element is called DNA,a copy of which can be found in every cell. The existence of genes
    and the chemical structure of DNA were understood by the mid-1900s,but scientists have only recently been
    able to identify a person from just a drop of blood or a single hair.
    One of the most important uses of DNA testing is in criminal investigation.The very first use of DNA
    testing in a criminal case was in 1985 in Great Britain,when a man confessed to killing a young woman in
    the English countryside.Because police had found samples of the killer's DNA at the scene of the crime,a
    biologist suggested that it might be possible to compare that DNA to some from the confessor's blood.To
    everyone's surprise,the tests showed that he was not the killer. Nor was he guilty of a similar murder that
    had happened some time earlier. At that point he admitted that he had confessed to the crimes out of fear
    and police pressure.The police then asked 5,000 local men for samples of their blood,and DNA testing
    revealed that one of them was the real murderer,so the first man was set free.
    In 1992,two law professors,Peter Neufeld and Bany Scheck,decided to use DNA evidence to help set free
    such mistakenly convicted prisoners.With the help of their students.they created a not-for-profit organization
    called the Innocence Project. Most of their clients are poor men,many from racial and ethnic minorities.In
    fact,studies have shown that U. S. judges and juries are often influenced by racial and ethnic background,and
    that people from minority groups are more likely to be convicted. Some of these men had been sentenced to
    death,a form of punishment used in thirty eight states out of fifty(as of 2006).For most of these prisoners,their
    only hope was another trial in which DNA testing could be used to prove their innocence.
    Between 1992 and 2006,the Innocence Project helped free 100 men.Some of these prisoners had been
    in jail for ten,twenty years or more for crimes they did not commit.However,the goal of the Innocence
    Project is not simply to set free those who are wrongfully in jail.They also hope to bring about real changes
    in the criminal justice system.
    Illinois in the late 1990s,a group of journalism students at Northwestern University were able to bring
    about such a change in that state.They began investigating some Illinois prisoners who claimed to be inno-
    cent. Through DNA testing,the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the
    crimes they had been accused of. Thirteen of these men were set free,and in 2000,Governor Ryan of
    Illinois decided to stop carrying out death sentences until further study could be made of the prisoners'
    cases。
    The use of DNA in criminal cases is still being debated around the world.Some fear that governments
    will one day keep records of everyone'sDNA,which could put limits on the privacy and freedom of citizens.
    Other people mistrust the science of DNA testing and think that lawyers use it to get their clients free whether
    or not they are guilty.But for those whose innocence has been proven and who are now free men,DNA
    testing has meant nothing less than a return to life.And with the careful use of DNA testing,no innocent
    person should ever be convicted again.

    Some students in Northwestern University__________.
    A:proved some prisoners were not guilty
    B:believed some suspects were from ethnic groups
    C:told the governors of Illinois not to free the prisoners
    D:showed DNA testing was not always reliable

    答案:A
    解析:
    文章第一段总领全文,最后一段是对全文的总结,中间其他段落通过举例说明DNA测 试法在当今犯罪侦查中起着重要的作用。
    由文章第二段第二、三句话“The very first use of DNA testing in a criminal case was in 1985 in Great Britain...Because police had found samples of the killer' s DNA...”可知答案为D。
    由文章第三段第一、二句话“In 1992...Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck, decided to use DNA evidence to help set free such mistakenly convicted prisoners…they created a not-for-profit organization called the Innocence Project.”可知答案为A。
    由文章第五段第三句话“Through DNA testing, the students were able to prove that in fact the prisoners were not guilty of the crimes they had been accused of.”中,这些学生是指西北大学 的学生,由此可知答案为A。
    本文主要讲述了DNA测试法在犯罪侦查当中起的积极作用,同时还举了例子,比如西 北大学的一些学生用DNA测试法来证明了一些人的清白。既然作者认为这种方法是有效、积 极的东西,当然是对其支持的。选项中表示支持、赞成的词为Positive,由此可以确定本题答案 为B选项。

  • 第19题:

    根据以下材料,回答
    The American Revolution was not arevolution in the sense of a radical or total change. It was not a sudden andviolent overturning of the political and social framework, such as lateroccurred in France and Russia, when both were already independent nations.Significant changes were ushered in, but they were not breathtaking. Whathappened was accelerated evolution rather than outright revolution. During theconflict itself people went on working and praying, marrying and playing. Mostof them were not seriously disturbed by the actual fighting, and many of themore isolated communities scarcely knew that a war was on.
    America′s War of Independence heralded thebirth of three modem nations. One was Canada, which received its first largeinflux of English-speaking population from the thousands of loyalists who fledthere from the United States. Another was Australia, which became a penalcolony now that America was no longer available for prisoners and debtors. Thethird new comer--the United States--based itself squarely on republican principles.
    Yet even the political overturn was not asrevolutionary as one might suppose. In some states, notable Connecticut andRhode Island, the war largely ratified a colonial self-rule alreadyexisting.British officials, everywhere ousted, were replaced by a home-growngoverning class, which promptly sought a local substitute for king andParliament.

    What will the paragraph following thepassage most probably discuss?

    A.The transport of prisoners to Australia.
    B.The creation of new state governments.
    C.Events leading up to the AmericanRevolution.
    D.How Canada and the United States becamefriends.

    答案:B
    解析:
    推断题。文章第二段讲的是美国独立战争宣布了三个现代国家的诞生:加拿大、澳大利亚、美国。第三段说的是美国创立的具体情况,并列举康涅狄格和罗德岛等州来举例说明。因此推断文章接下来最有可能谈论的是新州政府的成立。

  • 第20题:

    Prisoners were kept in the mostappalling conditions.

    A: flexible
    B: terrible
    C: reasonable
    D: serious

    答案:B
    解析:
    句意:囚犯们被关在最可怕的环境中。画线单词appalling意为“骇人听闻的,可怕的”。A项flexibl。意为“灵活的,易弯曲的”;B项terrible意为“可怕的”,与画线单词同义;C项reasonable意为“有道理的”;D项serious意为“严重的,认真的”。故本题选B。

  • 第21题:

    囚徒困境(prisoners’dilemma)


    正确答案:囚徒困境指两个被捕获的囚犯之间的一种特殊“博弈”,说明为什么甚至在合作对双方有利时,保持合作也是困难的。囚徒困境是图克(Tucker)在20世纪40年代首先提出的,之后作为博弈论的经典案例被广泛引用。囚徒困境反映了个人理性追求并不一定能达到最后集体理性的结果,而个人理性达到集体理性的论断一直是主流经济学的主要思想。
    囚徒困境是非零和博弈的著名例子,产生于被拘留并分别受审的罪犯的决策问题。假设检察官认为他们有罪,但未获确切的证据。摆在两个罪犯面前的情况是:两个人都不招供并不告发同谋犯,他们就会免受惩罚或判处轻刑;如果一个招供,而另一个拒绝招供,则招供者会受到从轻发落,而不认罪者会受到严惩;如果两个人都招供,则他们都会判刑,但没有只有一个人招供时判的那么重。本来“最好的”解是攻守同盟、拒不认罪,但从人的理性出发,每个人都受到引诱招供而让其他人承担后果,然而,这一符合个人理性的后果却导致了明显的不合集体理性的后果。“囚徒困境”对策适合于模拟各类冲突问题,如核裁军会谈、劳资双方的工资谈判等。
    囚徒困境模型深刻地揭示了社会和经济生活中的一种普遍情形,即“个人理性”与“集体理性”的矛盾,这就是“困境”。

  • 第22题:

    单选题
    How many adult life jackets are required on board a ship?()
    A

    Enough for 100 percent of the persons allowed on board

    B

    One for each work station and industrial work site

    C

    Enough for 150 percent of the persons allowed on board

    D

    Both A and B above


    正确答案: D
    解析: 暂无解析

  • 第23题:

    单选题
    The Bush Administration insisted that all prisoners of war be released before the U.S. _____ the government of Vietnam.
    A

    recognized

    B

    admitted

    C

    realized

    D

    appreciated


    正确答案: C
    解析:
    句意:布什政府坚持在美国承认越南政府之前必须释放所有的战犯。recognize在这里是外交用词,表示“甲国承认乙国”。