单选题Which of the following would a teacher encourage students to do in order to develop their cognitive strategies?A To make a study plan.B To summarize a story.C To read a text aloud.D To do pattern drills.

本题考查教师的角色。
A选项，由关键词“organize”可知，教师的角色为组织者。综上，A选项正确。
B选项，提供给学生帮助，教师的角色为推动者。
C选项，给予反馈，教师的角色为评价者。
D选项，教师参与到学生活动中，教师的角色为参与者。
故正确选项为A。

本题考查提问方式。

题目中问哪种提问方式可以保证所有的学生都积极参与到教学活动中来。

C是提出问题后随意点名，这样可以保证所有学生的关注。综上,正确答案为C。

A是提问那些英语好的人，这会让那些英语不好的学生疏于关注，故排除。

B是按照一定的顺序来进行提问，这种方式会让顺序外的学生失去兴趣，故排除。

D是先点名提问，之后给出问题，这种方式会导致其余学生不去关注问题，故排除。

故正确答案为C项。

过程写作的特点有：
Focus on the process of writing that leads to the final written product;
Help student writers understand their own composing process;
Help them build repretoires of strategies for prewriting, drafting, and rewriting;
Give students time to write and rewrite;
Place central importance on the process of revision;
Let students discover what they want to say as they write;
Give students feedback throughout the composing process(not just on the final product) to consider as they attempt to bring their expression closer and closer to intention;
Encourage feedback both from the instructor and peers;
Include individual conferences between teacher and student during the process of composition.
过程写作关注写作的内容与过程。D项不属于过程写作的特点，故选D。

考查课堂管理。在课堂管理与教学中，应以学生为主体。

本题考查语篇教学。题干的意思：如果教师想培养学生的语篇能力，他／她最有可能采用以下哪种练习A项“释义句子”，B项“翻译句子”，C项“整理句子”，D项“转换句子”。语篇能力就是能够依靠上下文或语境理解篇章和通过衔接连贯、逻辑联系等手段组织篇章结构的能力，简而言之，就是能够对篇章信息进行理解、加工和再创作的能力。释义句子即用英语解释或转换句子，符合题意。故本题选A。

本题考查阅读教学。题干的意思：下列哪种练习可以鼓励学生批判性地阅读文章A项“评价它的观点”，B项“找出事实”，C项为“找到细节信息”，D项“做翻译练习”。评价文章观点的活动能够引导学生在理解文本的基础上对文章中的观点进行分析、评判，促使学生主动、积极地思考，促进学生批判性思维的发展。故本题选A。

本题考查语篇教学。题干的意思：如果教师想培养学生的语篇能力，他／她最有可能采用以下哪种练习A项“释义句子”，B项“翻译句子”，C项“整理句子”，D项“转换句子”。语篇能力就是能够依靠上下文或语境理解篇章和通过衔接连贯、逻辑联系等手段组织篇章结构的能力，简而言之，就是能够对篇章信息进行理解、加工和再创作的能力。释义句子即用英语解释或转换句子，符合题意。故本题选A。

考查课堂提问方式。题干中问“当在课堂上检查学生们对于某个语言点是否理解时，老师应该选择下面哪种表达方式”。B项中有代指语言点的“it’，具有目的性。同时，问题也针对每个同学，问大家是否清楚明白，具有针对性。故选B。

考查语法教学。B项表示输入强化，有利于引导学生加强对语法点的注意。其余三项适用于语法练习与巩固环节。

本题考查课程标准知识。题干的意思：为了培养学生的认知策略，教师会鼓励学生怎样做A项“制订学习计划”，B项“概述故事”，C项“大声读文章”，D项“做句型练习”。认知策略是指学生为了完成具体学习任务而采取的步骤和方法，同时也包括学习者加工信息的一些方法和技术。概述属于加工信息的一种方法。故本题选B。

本题考查课程标准知识。题干的意思：为了培养学生的认知策略，教师会鼓励学生怎样做A项“制订学习计划”，B项“概述故事”，C项“大声读文章”，D项“做句型练习”。认知策略是指学生为了完成具体学习任务而采取的步骤和方法，同时也包括学习者加工信息的一些方法和技术。概述属于加工信息的一种方法。故本题选B。

本题考查课堂组织活动。题干的意思：下列哪种练习最有可能培养学生在学习中的合作精神A项“完成项目”，B项“听写”，C项“考试”．D项“抄写课文”。根据题意，在完成项目时需要多方合作，这最有可能培养学生的合作精神。故本题选A。

本题考查教师的角色。

根据题干中的关键词“join in”,教师加入小组活动中，真正成为小组活动的一员与小组成员互动，可知正确答案为“participant”，综上，C选项正确。

A选项，资源的帮助者，不合题意，故排除。

B选项，控制者，不合题意，故排除。

D选项，评价者，不合题意，故排除。

故正确选项为C。

Teachers' Salaries Linked With Students' Evaluation Nowadays, people tend to break thetraditional absolute authority of teachers and grant students more freedom, whichmakes the classroom more liberal and democratic. In some pilot programs,teachers' salaries are linked with students' evaluation.
While this is without doubt a good attempt,it seems to have gone too far. As I see it, students' evaluation is not a reliablecriterion to judge teaching quality and overemphasis on the evaluation maycause difficulties on the teachers' side. To start with, students' evaluationis far less than accurate. Hence linking the evaluation directly with teachers'salaries is not appropriate. Generally speaking, it is very difficult forstudents to evaluate their teachers fairly and objectively. Not beingeducational experts, students' evaluation is solely based on how they feelabout the teachers: Is this teacher friendly to the students? Is he too strictand most importantly, is he likely to give a high score to a particularstudent? Such evaluation is highly subjective, unprofessional and unreasonable.A teacher may receive less salary because he is so responsible for his coursethat he has failed a couple of students in the exam. Apparently, such evaluationsystem is not fair when seen from the aspect of the students' immaturejudgment. Additionally, such system actually does no good to students. Everyteacher has his own teaching plan and teaching style. We cannot expect teachersto make every student pleased and satisfied, because one man's meat can beanother man's poison.
However, under such evaluation mechanism,students are given too much power which they do not know how to exercisewisely. Students tend to blame the teacher--not themselves or the courses--oncethey feel unhappy about their study. And it is likely that some students willabuse their power to vent off such unhappiness by giving unreasonably lowscores to their teachers in the evaluation. In this case, teachers may losetheir initiatives in teaching, and be forced to please their students, whichwill lead to the deterioration of teaching quality. Therefore, such evaluationsystem is not good for students.
Giving students more freedom is advisable.But before rushing into implementing new rules, we should always consider thepossible outcomes. Linking teachers' salaries with students' evaluation mayseem a good idea at the first glance, but actually it will affect the teachingquality by giving too, much power to educational amateurs.