更多“(b) With reference to CF Co, explain the ethical and other professional issues raised. (9 marks)”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    (c) Mr Cobar, the chief executive of SHC, has decided to draft two alternative statements to explain both possible

    outcomes of the secrecy/licensing decision to shareholders. Once the board has decided which one to pursue,

    the relevant draft will be included in a voluntary section of the next corporate annual report.

    Required:

    (i) Draft a statement in the event that the board chooses the secrecy option. It should make a convincing

    business case and put forward ethical arguments for the secrecy option. The ethical arguments should

    be made from the stockholder (or pristine capitalist) perspective. (8 marks)

    (ii) Draft a statement in the event that the board chooses the licensing option. It should make a convincing

    business case and put forward ethical arguments for the licensing option. The ethical arguments should

    be made from the wider stakeholder perspective. (8 marks)

    (iii) Professional marks for the persuasiveness and logical flow of arguments: two marks per statement.

    (4 marks)


    正确答案:

    (c) (i) For the secrecy option
    Important developments at SHC
    This is an exciting time for the management and shareholders of Swan Hill Company. The research and development
    staff at SHC have made a groundbreaking discovery (called the ‘sink method’) that will enable your company to produce
    its major product at lower cost, in higher volumes and at a much higher quality than our competitors will be able to
    using, as they do, the existing production technology. The sink process also produces at a lower rate of environmental
    emissions which, as I’m sure shareholders will agree, is a very welcome development.
    When considering the options following the discovery, your board decided that we should press ahead with the
    investment needed to transform. the production facilities without offering the use of the technology to competitors under
    a licensing arrangement. This means that once the new sink production comes on stream, SHC shareholders can, your
    board believes, look forward to a significant strengthening of our competitive position.
    The business case for this option is overwhelming. By pushing ahead with the investment needed to implement the sink
    method, the possibility exists to gain a substantial competitive advantage over all of SHC’s competitors. It will place SHC
    in a near monopolist position in the short term and in a dominant position long term. This will, in turn, give the company
    pricing power in the industry and the likelihood of superior profits for many years to come. We would expect SHC to
    experience substantial ‘overnight’ growth and the returns from this will reward shareholders’ loyalty and significantly
    increase the value of the company. Existing shareholders can reasonably expect a significant increase in the value of
    their holdings over the very short term and also over the longer term.
    Ethical implications of the secrecy option
    In addition to the overwhelming business case, however, there is a strong ethical case for the secrecy option. SHC
    recognises that it is the moral purpose of SHC to make profits in order to reward those who have risked their own money
    to support it over many years. Whilst some companies pursue costly programmes intended to serve multiple stakeholder
    interests, SHC recognises that it is required to comply with the demands of its legal owners, its shareholders, and not
    to dilute those demands with other concerns that will reduce shareholder returns. This is an important part of the agency
    relationship: the SHC board will always serve the best economic interests of its shareholders: its legal owners. The SHC
    board believes that any action taken that renders shareholder returns suboptimal is a threat to shareholder value and an
    abuse of the agency position. Your board will always seek to maximise shareholder wealth; hence our decision to pursue
    the secrecy option in this case. The secrecy option offers the possibility of optimal shareholder value and because
    shareholders invest in SHC to maximise returns, that is the only ethical action for the board to pursue. Happily, this
    option will also protect the employees’ welfare in SHC’s hometown of Swan Hill and demonstrate its commitment to the
    locality. This, in turn, will help to manage two of the key value-adding resources in the company, its employees and its
    reputation. This will help in local recruitment and staff retention in future years.
    (ii) For the licensing option
    Important developments at SHC
    Your board was recently faced with a very difficult business and ethical decision. After the discovery by SHC scientists
    of the groundbreaking sink production method, we had a choice of keeping the new production technology secret or
    sharing the breakthrough under a licensing arrangement with our competitors. After a lengthy discussion, your board
    decided that we should pursue the licensing option and I would like to explain our reasons for this on both business and
    ethical grounds.
    In terms of the business case for licensing, I would like shareholders to understand that although the secrecy option may
    have offered SHC the possibility of an unassailable competitive advantage, in reality, it would have incurred a number
    of risks. Because of the speed with which we would have needed to have acted, it would have necessitated a large
    increase in our borrowing, bringing about a substantial change in our financial structure. This would, in turn, increase
    liquidity pressures and make us more vulnerable to rising interest rates. A second risk with the secrecy option would
    involve the security of the sink technology ‘secret’. If the sink process was leaked or discovered by competitors and
    subsequently copied, our lack of a legally binding patent would mean we would have no legal way to stop them
    proceeding with their own version of the sink process.
    As well as avoiding the risks, however, the licensing option offers a number of specific business advantages. The royalties
    from the licences granted to competitors are expected to be very large indeed. These will be used over the coming years
    to extend our existing competitive advantage in the future. Finally, the ‘improvement sharing’ clause in the licensing
    contract will ensure that the sink process will be improved and perfected with several manufacturers using the
    technology at the same time. SHC’s sink production may, in consequence, improve at a faster rate than would have
    been the case were we to have pursued the secrecy option.
    Ethical implications of the licensing option
    In addition to the business case, there is also a powerful ethical case for the decision we have taken. As a good,
    responsible corporate citizen, Swan Hill Company acknowledges its many stakeholders and recognises the impacts that
    a business decision has on others. Your board recognises that in addition to external stakeholders having influence over
    our operations, our decisions can also affect others. In this case, we have carefully considered the likelihood that keeping
    the new technology a secret from our competitors would radically reshape the industry. The superior environmental
    performance of the sink process over existing methods will also mean that when fully adopted, the environmental
    emissions of the entire industry will be reduced. SHC is very proud of this contribution to this reduction in overall
    environmental impact.
    There seems little doubt that the secrecy option would have had far-reaching and unfortunate effects upon our industry
    and our competitors. The licensing option will allow competitors, and their employees and shareholders, to survive. It
    is a compassionate act on our part and shows mercy to the other competitors in the industry. It recognises the number
    of impacts that a business decision has and would be the fairest (and most just) option given the number of people
    affected.

  • 第2题:

    (c) Explain how absolutist (dogmatic) and relativist (pragmatic) ethical assumptions would affect the outcome

    of Anne’s decision. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) Absolutism and relativism
    Absolutism and relativism represent two extreme positions of ethical assumptions.
    Definitions
    An absolutist assumption is one that believes that there are ‘eternal’ rules that should guide all ethical and moral decision
    making in all situations. Accordingly, in any given situation, there is likely to be one right course of action regardless of the
    outcome. An absolutist believes that this should be chosen regardless of the consequences or the cost. A dogmatic approach
    to morality is an example of an absolutist approach to ethics. A dogmatic assumption is one that is accepted without
    discussion or debate.
    Relativist assumptions are ‘situational’ in nature. Rather than arguing that there is a single right choice, a relativist will tend
    to adopt a pragmatic approach and decide, in the light of the situation being considered, which is the best outcome. This will
    involve a decision on what outcome is the most favourable and that is a matter of personal judgment.
    Outcomes
    If Anne were to adopt absolutist/dogmatic assumptions, she would be likely to decide that she would need to pursue what
    she perceives is the right course of action regardless of cost to herself or the relationship with the client or her manager. Given
    that she unearthed a suspect and unaccounted-for payment, and that she received an inadequate explanation from the client,
    she would probably recommend extension to the audit beyond the weekend.
    If Ann were to adopt relativist or pragmatic assumptions, she would have a potentially much more complicated decision to
    make. She would have to decide whether it was more important, ethically, to yield to the pressure from Zachary in the
    interests of her short-term career interests or ‘hold out’ to protect the interests of the shareholders. Anne could recommend
    sign off and trust the FD’s explanation but she is more likely to seek further evidence or assurance from the company before
    she does so.

  • 第3题:

    (b) Explain by reference to Hira Ltd’s loss position why it may be beneficial for it not to claim any capital

    allowances for the year ending 31 March 2007. Support your explanation with relevant calculations.

    (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) The advantage of Hira Ltd not claiming any capital allowances
    In the year ending 31 March 2007 Hira Ltd expects to make a tax adjusted trading loss, before deduction of capital
    allowances, of £55,000 and to surrender the maximum amount possible of trading losses to Belgrove Ltd and Dovedale Ltd.
    For the first nine months of the year from 1 April 2006 to 31 December 2006 Hira Ltd is in a loss relief group with Belgrove
    Ltd. The maximum surrender to Belgrove Ltd for this period is the lower of:
    – the available loss of £41,250 (£55,000 x 9/12); and
    – the profits chargeable to corporation tax of Belgrove of £28,500 (£38,000 x 9/12).
    i.e. £28,500. This leaves losses of £12,750 (£41,250 – £28,500) unrelieved.
    For the remaining three months from 1 January 2007 to 31 March 2007 Hira Ltd is a consortium company because at least
    75% of its share capital is owned by companies, each of which own at least 5%. It can surrender £8,938 (£55,000 x 3/12
    x 65%) to Dovedale Ltd and £4,812 (£55,000 x 3/12 x 35%) to Belgrove Ltd as both companies have sufficient taxable
    profits to offset the losses. Accordingly, there are no losses remaining from the three-month period.
    The unrelieved losses from the first nine months must be carried forward as Hira Ltd has no income or gains in that year or
    the previous year. However, the losses cannot be carried forward beyond 1 January 2007 (the date of the change of
    ownership of Hira Ltd) if there is a major change in the nature or conduct of the trade of Hira Ltd. Even if the losses can be
    carried forward, the earliest year in which they can be relieved is the year ending 31 March 2009 as Hira Ltd is expected to
    make a trading loss in the year ending 31 March 2008.
    Any capital allowances claimed by Hira Ltd in the year ending 31 March 2007 would increase the tax adjusted trading loss
    for that year and consequently the unrelieved losses arising in the first nine months.
    If the capital allowances are not claimed, the whole of the tax written down value brought forward of £96,000 would be
    carried forward to the year ending 31 March 2008 thus increasing the capital allowances and the tax adjusted trading loss,
    for that year. By not claiming any capital allowances, Hira Ltd can effectively transfer a current period trading loss, which
    would be created by capital allowances, of £24,000 (25% x £96,000) from the year ending 31 March 2007 to the following
    year where it can be surrendered to the two consortium members.

  • 第4题:

    5 You are an audit manager in Dedza, a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. Recently, you have been assigned

    specific responsibility for undertaking annual reviews of existing clients. The following situations have arisen in

    connection with three client companies:

    (a) Dedza was appointed auditor and tax advisor to Kora Co, a limited liability company, last year and has recently

    issued an unmodified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended 30 June 2005. To your surprise,

    the tax authority has just launched an investigation into the affairs of Kora on suspicion of underdeclaring income.

    (7 marks)

    Required:

    Identify and comment on the ethical and other professional issues raised by each of these matters and state what

    action, if any, Dedza should now take.

    NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three situations.


    正确答案:
    5 DEDZA CO
    (a) Tax investigation
    ■ Kora is a relatively new client. Before accepting the assignment(s) Dedza should have carried out customer due
    diligence (CDD). Dedza should therefore have a sufficient knowledge and understanding of Kora to be aware of any
    suspicions that the tax authority might have.
    ■ As the investigation has come as a surprise it is possible that, for example:
    – the tax authority’s suspicions are unfounded;
    – Dedza has failed to recognise suspicious circumstances.
    Tutorial note: In either case, Dedza should seek clarification on the period of suspicion and review relevant procedures.
    ■ Dedza should review any communication from the predecessor auditor obtained in response to its ‘professional inquiry’
    (for any professional reasons why the appointment should not have been accepted).
    ■ A quality control for new audits is that the audit opinion should be subject to a second partner review before it is issued.
    It should be considered now whether or not such a review took place. If it did, then it should be sufficiently well
    documented to evidence that the review was thorough and not a mere formality.
    ■ Criminal property includes the proceeds of tax evasion. If Kora is found to be guilty of under-declaring income that is a
    money laundering offence.
    ■ Dedza’s reputational risk will be increased if implicated because it knew (or ought to have known) about Kora’s activities.
    (Dedza may also be liable if found to have been negligent in failing to detect any material misstatement arising in the
    2004/05 financial statements as a result.)
    ■ Kora’s audit working paper files and tax returns should be reviewed for any suspicion of fraud being committed by Kora
    or error overlooked by Dedza. Tax advisory work should have been undertaken and/or reviewed by a manager/partner
    not involved in the audit work.
    ■ As tax advisor, Dedza could soon be making disclosures of misstatements to the tax authority on behalf of Kora. Dedza
    should encourage Kora to make necessary disclosure voluntarily.
    ■ Dedza will not be in breach of its duty of confidentiality to Kora if Kora gives Dedza permission to disclose information
    to the tax authority (or Dedza is legally required to do so).
    ■ If Dedza finds reasonable grounds to know or suspect that potential disclosures to the tax authority relate to criminal
    conduct, then a suspicious transaction report (STR) should be made to the financial intelligence unit (FIU) also.
    Tutorial note: Though not the main issue credit will be awarded for other ethical issues such as the potential selfinterest/
    self-review threat arising from the provision of other services.

  • 第5题:

    (c) Your firm has provided financial advice to the Pholey family for many years and this has sometimes involved your

    firm in carrying out transactions on their behalf. The eldest son, Esau, is to take up a position as a senior

    government official to a foreign country next month. (4 marks)

    Required:

    Identify and comment on the ethical and other professional issues raised by each of these matters and state what

    action, if any, Dedza should now take.

    NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three situations


    正确答案:
    (c) Financial advisor
    ■ Customer due diligence (CDD) and record-keeping measures apply to designated non-financial businesses and
    professions (such as Dedza) who prepare for or carry out certain transactions on behalf of their clients.
    ■ Esau is a ‘politically exposed person’ (‘PEP’) (i.e. an individual who is to be entrusted with prominent public functions
    in a foreign country).
    ■ Dedza’s business relationships with Pholey therefore involve reputational risks similar to those with Esau. In addition
    to performing normal due diligence measures Dedza should:
    ? have risk management systems to have determined that Esau is a PEP;
    ? obtain senior partner approval for maintaining business relationships with such customers;
    ? take reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and source of funds;
    ? conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of the business relationship.
    ■ Dedza can choose to decline to act for Pholey and/or Esau (if asked).
    ■ If the business relationship is to be continued senior partner approval should be obtained for any transactions carried
    out on Pholey’s behalf in future.
    Tutorial note: The Pholey family is not described as an audit client therefore no familiarity threat arises in relation to an
    audit (the family may not have any involvement in entities requiring an audit).

  • 第6题:

    (b) Chatam, a limited liability company, is a long-standing client. One of its subsidiaries, Ayora, has made losses

    for several years. At your firm’s request, Chatam’s management has made a written representation that goodwill

    arising on the acquisition of Ayora is not impaired. Your firm’s auditor’s report on the consolidated financial

    statements of Chatam for the year ended 31 March 2005 is unmodified. Your firm’s auditor’s report on the

    financial statements of Ayora is similarly unmodified. Chatam’s Chief Executive, Charles Barrington, is due to

    retire in 2006 when his share options mature. (6 marks)

    Required:

    Comment on the ethical and other professional issues raised by each of the above matters and their implications,

    if any, for the continuation of each assignment.

    NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.


    正确答案:
    (b) Unmodified auditor’s reports
    Ethical and professional issues
    ■ An unmodified opinion means, inter alia, that:
    – there are no material matters giving rise to disagreement with the auditor; and
    – the auditor’s report does not include an emphasis of matter paragraph (e.g. regarding going concern).
    ■ By implication the auditor must have obtained sufficient appropriate evidence that notwithstanding the losses:
    – the going concern basis is appropriate to Ayora’s financial statements and any related matters (e.g. parental
    support) are adequately disclosed therein;
    – goodwill in Chatam’s consolidated financial statements is not materially impaired.
    ■ Management’s written representation (that the goodwill is not impaired) must have been necessary (otherwise it should
    not have been asked for). This means that Bartolome does not have sufficient other audit evidence. This seems dubious
    as management should have carried out an impairment test to satisfy themselves that goodwill is not impaired. This
    test should similarly have satisfied Bartolome.
    ■ If there is evidence that goodwill is impaired management’s refusal to write it down might be considered a fraud.
    ■ The matter may cast doubt on the quality of audit evidence obtained in other areas. All other matters on which
    management representations have been obtained should be reviewed by another audit partner/manager.
    ■ Charles Barrington is retiring next year and his share options would presumably be worth less if goodwill were written
    down. His position in this long-standing client suggests a familiarity threat.
    ■ Bartolome may be threatened by self-interest to accept the representation as sufficient in order to retain the client.
    ■ Bartolome may be unduly influenced by a combination of factors (familiarity and previous experience) and failing to
    exercise the necessary degree of professional scepticism.
    Implications for continuation with assignment
    There is no reason why the audit should not be continued. However, a change in senior audit staff and audit manager may
    be overdue. The unmodified auditor’s reports should be subject to a cold review and any quality control issues raised with
    the staff who conducted the audit.

  • 第7题:

    6 The explosive growth of investing and raising capital in the global markets has put new emphasis on the development

    of international accounting, auditing and ethical standards. The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has

    been at the forefront of the development of the worldwide accountancy profession through its activities in ethics,

    auditing and education.

    Required:

    Explain the developments in each of the following areas and indicate how they affect Chartered Certified

    Accountants:

    (a) IFAC’s ‘Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants’; (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    6 DEVELOPMENTS AND CERTIFIED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
    Tutorial note: The answer which follows is indicative of the range of points which might be made. Other relevant material will
    be given suitable credit.
    (a) IFAC’s ‘Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants’
    Since its issue in 1996, IFAC’s ‘Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants’ (‘The Code’) has undergone several revisions
    (1996, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2005). IFAC holds the view that due to national differences (of culture, language, legal and
    social systems) the task of preparing detailed ethical requirements is primarily that of the member bodies in each country
    concerned (and that they also have the responsibility to implement and enforce such requirements).
    In recognizing the responsibilities of the accountancy profession, IFAC considers its own role to be in providing guidance and
    promoting harmonization. IFAC has established ‘The Code’ to provide a basis on which the ethical requirements for
    professional accountants in each country should be founded.
    IFAC’s conceptual approach is principles-based. It provides a route to convergence that emphasises the profession’s integrity.
    This approach may be summarised as:
    ■ identifying and evaluating circumstances and relationships that create threats (e.g. to independence); and
    ■ taking appropriate action to:
    – eliminate these threats; or
    – reduce them to an acceptable level by the application of safeguards.
    If no safeguards are available to reduce a threat to an acceptable level an assurance engagement must be refused or
    discontinued.
    This approach was first introduced to Section 8 of The Code, on independence, and is applicable to assurance engagements
    when the assurance report is dated on or after 31 December 2004.
    Further to the cases of Enron, Worldcom and Parmalat, IFAC issued a revised Code in July 2005 that applies to all professional
    accountants, whether in public practice, business, industry or government2.
    A member body of IFAC may not apply less stringent standards than those stated in the Code. The Code is effective from
    30 June 2006.
    Practicing accountants and members in business must maintain the high standards of professional ethics that are expected
    by their professional bodies (such as ACCA). These developments codify current best practice in the wake of the
    aforementioned recent corporate scandals.
    The developments in The Code have wider application in that it:
    ■ applies to all assurance services (not just audit);
    ■ considers the standpoints of the firm and of the assurance team.
    Since ACCA is a member-body of IFAC the elevation of The Code to a standard will affect all Chartered Certified Accountants.
    .

  • 第8题:

    (ii) Briefly explain the implications of Parr & Co’s audit opinion for your audit opinion on the consolidated

    financial statements of Cleeves Co for the year ended 30 September 2006. (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Implications for audit opinion on consolidated financial statements of Cleeves
    ■ If the potential adjustments to non-current asset carrying amounts and loss are not material to the consolidated
    financial statements there will be no implication. However, as Howard is material to Cleeves and the modification
    appears to be ‘so material’ (giving rise to adverse opinion) this seems unlikely.
    Tutorial note: The question clearly states that Howard is material to Cleeves, thus there is no call for speculation
    on this.
    ■ As Howard is wholly-owned the management of Cleeves must be able to request that Howard’s financial statements
    are adjusted to reflect the impairment of the assets. The auditor’s report on Cleeves will then be unmodified
    (assuming that any impairment of the investment in Howard is properly accounted for in the separate financial
    statements of Cleeves).
    ■ If the impairment losses are not recognised in Howard’s financial statements they can nevertheless be adjusted on
    consolidation of Cleeves and its subsidiaries (by writing down assets to recoverable amounts). The audit opinion
    on Cleeves should then be unmodified in this respect.
    ■ If there is no adjustment of Howard’s asset values (either in Howard’s financial statements or on consolidation) it
    is most likely that the audit opinion on Cleeves’s consolidated financial statements would be ‘except for’. (It should
    not be adverse as it is doubtful whether even the opinion on Howard’s financial statements should be adverse.)
    Tutorial note: There is currently no requirement in ISA 600 to disclose that components have been audited by another
    auditor unless the principal auditor is permitted to base their opinion solely upon the report of another auditor.

  • 第9题:

    (b) Explain what effect the acquisition of Di Rollo Co will have on the planning of your audit of the consolidated

    financial statements of Murray Co for the year ending 31 March 2008. (10 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Effect of acquisition on planning the audit of Murray’s consolidated financial statements for the year ending 31 March
    2008
    Group structure
    The new group structure must be ascertained to identify all entities that should be consolidated into the Murray group’s
    financial statements for the year ending 31 March 2008.
    Materiality assessment
    Preliminary materiality for the group will be much higher, in monetary terms, than in the prior year. For example, if a % of
    total assets is a determinant of the preliminary materiality, it may be increased by 10% (as the fair value of assets acquired,
    including goodwill, is $2,373,000 compared with $21·5m in Murray’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended
    31 March 2007).
    The materiality of each subsidiary should be re-assessed, in terms of the enlarged group as at the planning stage. For
    example, any subsidiary that was just material for the year ended 31 March 2007 may no longer be material to the group.
    This assessment will identify, for example:
    – those entities requiring an audit visit; and
    – those entities for which substantive analytical procedures may suffice.
    As Di Rollo’s assets are material to the group Ross should plan to inspect the South American operations. The visit may
    include a meeting with Di Rollo’s previous auditors to discuss any problems that might affect the balances at acquisition and
    a review of the prior year audit working papers, with their permission.
    Di Rollo was acquired two months into the financial year therefore its post-acquisition results should be expected to be
    material to the consolidated income statement.
    Goodwill acquired
    The assets and liabilities of Di Rollo at 31 March 2008 will be combined on a line-by-line basis into the consolidated financial
    statements of Murray and goodwill arising on acquisition recognised.
    Audit work on the fair value of the Di Rollo brand name at acquisition, $600,000, may include a review of a brand valuation
    specialist’s working papers and an assessment of the reasonableness of assumptions made.
    Significant items of plant are likely to have been independently valued prior to the acquisition. It may be appropriate to plan
    to place reliance on the work of expert valuers. The fair value adjustment on plant and equipment is very high (441% of
    carrying amount at the date of acquisition). This may suggest that Di Rollo’s depreciation policies are over-prudent (e.g. if
    accelerated depreciation allowed for tax purposes is accounted for under local GAAP).
    As the amount of goodwill is very material (approximately 50% of the cash consideration) it may be overstated if Murray has
    failed to recognise any assets acquired in the purchase of Di Rollo in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations. For
    example, Murray may have acquired intangible assets such as customer lists or franchises that should be recognised
    separately from goodwill and amortised (rather than tested for impairment).
    Subsequent impairment
    The audit plan should draw attention to the need to consider whether the Di Rollo brand name and goodwill arising have
    suffered impairment as a result of the allegations against Di Rollo’s former chief executive.
    Liabilities
    Proceedings in the legal claim made by Di Rollo’s former chief executive will need to be reviewed. If the case is not resolved
    at 31 March 2008, a contingent liability may require disclosure in the consolidated financial statements, depending on the
    materiality of amounts involved. Legal opinion on the likelihood of Di Rollo successfully defending the claim may be sought.
    Provision should be made for any actual liabilities, such as legal fees.
    Group (related party) transactions and balances
    A list of all the companies in the group (including any associates) should be included in group audit instructions to ensure
    that intra-group transactions and balances (and any unrealised profits and losses on transactions with associates) are
    identified for elimination on consolidation. Any transfer pricing policies (e.g. for clothes manufactured by Di Rollo for Murray
    and sales of Di Rollo’s accessories to Murray’s retail stores) must be ascertained and any provisions for unrealised profit
    eliminated on consolidation.
    It should be confirmed at the planning stage that inter-company transactions are identified as such in the accounting systems
    of all companies and that inter-company balances are regularly reconciled. (Problems are likely to arise if new inter-company
    balances are not identified/reconciled. In particular, exchange differences are to be expected.)
    Other auditors
    If Ross plans to use the work of other auditors in South America (rather than send its own staff to undertake the audit of Di
    Rollo), group instructions will need to be sent containing:
    – proforma statements;
    – a list of group and associated companies;
    – a statement of group accounting policies (see below);
    – the timetable for the preparation of the group accounts (see below);
    – a request for copies of management letters;
    – an audit work summary questionnaire or checklist;
    – contact details (of senior members of Ross’s audit team).
    Accounting policies
    Di Rollo may have material accounting policies which do not comply with the rest of the Murray group. As auditor to Di Rollo,
    Ross will be able to recalculate the effect of any non-compliance with a group accounting policy (that Murray’s management
    would be adjusting on consolidation).
    Timetable
    The timetable for the preparation of Murray’s consolidated financial statements should be agreed with management as soon
    as possible. Key dates should be planned for:
    – agreement of inter-company balances and transactions;
    – submission of proforma statements;
    – completion of the consolidation package;
    – tax review of group accounts;
    – completion of audit fieldwork by other auditors;
    – subsequent events review;
    – final clearance on accounts of subsidiaries;
    – Ross’s final clearance of consolidated financial statements.
    Tutorial note: The order of dates is illustrative rather than prescriptive.

  • 第10题:

    (c) Assess how the fundamental ethical principles of IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants should

    be applied to the provision of a forensic investigation service. (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) Application of ethical principles to a fraud investigation
    IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants applies to all ACCA members involved in professional assignments,
    including forensic investigations. There are specific considerations in the application of each of the principles in providing
    such a service.
    Integrity
    The forensic investigator is likely to deal frequently with individuals who lack integrity, are dishonest, and attempt to conceal
    the true facts from the investigator. It is imperative that the investigator recognises this, and acts with impeccable integrity
    throughout the whole investigation.
    Objectivity
    As in an audit engagement, the investigator’s objectivity must be beyond question. The report that is the outcome of the
    forensic investigation must be perceived as independent, as it forms part of the legal evidence presented at court. The
    investigator must adhere to the concept that the overriding objective of court proceedings is to deal with cases fairly and justly.
    Any real or perceived threats to objectivity could undermine the credibility of the evidence provided by the investigator.
    This issue poses a particular problem where an audit client requests its auditors to conduct a forensic investigation. In this
    situation, the audit firm would be exposed to threats to objectivity in terms of advocacy, management involvement and selfreview.
    The advocacy threat arises because the audit firm may feel pressured into promoting the interests and point of view
    of their client, which would breach the overriding issue of objectivity in court proceedings. Secondly, the investigators could
    be perceived to be involved in management decisions regarding the implications of the fraud, especially where the investigator
    acts as an expert witness. It is however the self-review threat that would be the most significant threat to objectivity. The selfreview
    threat arises because the investigation is likely to involve the estimation of an amount (i.e. the loss), which could be
    material to the financial statements.
    For the reasons outlined above, The Code states that the firm should evaluate threats and put appropriate safeguards in place,
    and if safeguards cannot reduce the threats to an acceptable level, then the firm cannot provide both the audit service and
    the forensic investigation.
    Professional competence and due care
    Forensic investigations will involve very specialist skills, which accountants are unlikely to possess without extensive training.
    Such skills would include:
    – Detailed knowledge of the relevant legal framework surrounding fraud,
    – An understanding of how to gather specialist evidence,
    – Skills in the safe custody of evidence, including maintaining a clear ‘chain’ of evidence, and
    – Strong personal skills in, for example, interview techniques, presentation of material at court, and tactful dealing with
    difficult and stressful situations.
    It is therefore essential that forensic work is only ever undertaken by highly skilled individuals, under the direction and
    supervision of an experienced fraud investigator. Any doubt over the competence of the investigation team could severely
    undermine the credibility of the evidence presented at court.
    Confidentiality
    Normally accountants should not disclose information without the explicit consent of their client. However, during legal
    proceedings arising from a fraud investigation, the court will require the investigator to reveal information discovered during
    the investigation. There is an overriding requirement for the investigator to disclose all of the information deemed necessary
    by the court.
    Outside of the court, the investigator must ensure faultless confidentiality, especially because much of the information they
    have access to will be highly sensitive.
    Professional behaviour
    Fraud investigations can become a matter of public interest, and much media attention is often focused on the work of the
    forensic investigator. A highly professional attitude must be displayed at all times, in order to avoid damage to the reputation
    of the firm, and of the profession. Any lapse in professional behaviour could also undermine the integrity of the forensic
    evidence, and of the credibility of the investigator, especially when acting in the capacity of expert witness.
    During legal proceedings, the forensic investigator may be involved in discussions with both sides in the court case, and here
    it is essential that a courteous and considerate attitude is presented to all parties.

  • 第11题:

    (b) (i) Explain the matters you should consider, and the evidence you would expect to find in respect of the

    carrying value of the cost of investment of Dylan Co in the financial statements of Rosie Co; and

    (7 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) (i) Cost of investment on acquisition of Dylan Co
    Matters to consider
    According to the schedule provided by the client, the cost of investment comprises three elements. One matter to
    consider is whether the cost of investment is complete.
    It appears that no legal or professional fees have been included in the cost of investment (unless included within the
    heading ‘cash consideration’). Directly attributable costs should be included per IFRS 3 Business Combinations, and
    there is a risk that these costs may be expensed in error, leading to understatement of the investment.
    The cash consideration of $2·5 million is the least problematical component. The only matter to consider is whether the
    cash has actually been paid. Given that Dylan Co was acquired in the last month of the financial year it is possible that
    the amount had not been paid before the year end, in which case the amount should be recognised as a current liability
    on the statement of financial position (balance sheet). However, this seems unlikely given that normally control of an
    acquired company only passes to the acquirer on cash payment.
    IFRS 3 states that the cost of investment should be recognised at fair value, which means that deferred consideration
    should be discounted to present value at the date of acquisition. If the consideration payable on 31 January 2009 has
    not been discounted, the cost of investment, and the corresponding liability, will be overstated. It is possible that the
    impact of discounting the $1·5 million payable one year after acquisition would be immaterial to the financial
    statements, in which case it would be acceptable to leave the consideration at face value within the cost of investment.
    Contingent consideration should be accrued if it is probable to be paid. Here the amount is payable if revenue growth
    targets are achieved over the next four years. The auditor must therefore assess the probability of the targets being
    achieved, using forecasts and projections of Maxwell Co’s revenue. Such information is inherently subjective, and could
    have been manipulated, if prepared by the vendor of Maxwell Co, in order to secure the deal and maximise
    consideration. Here it will be crucial to be sceptical when reviewing the forecasts, and the assumptions underlying the
    data. The management of Rosie Co should have reached their own opinion on the probability of paying the contingent
    consideration, but they may have relied heavily on information provided at the time of the acquisition.
    Audit evidence
    – Agreement of the monetary value and payment dates of the consideration per the client schedule to legal
    documentation signed by vendor and acquirer.
    – Agreement of $2·5 million paid to Rosie Co’s bank statement and cash book prior to year end. If payment occurs
    after year end confirm that a current liability is recognised on the individual company and consolidated statement
    of financial position (balance sheet).
    – Board minutes approving the payment.
    – Recomputation of discounting calculations applied to deferred and contingent consideration.
    – Agreement that the discount rate used is pre-tax, and reflects current market assessment of the time value of money
    (e.g. by comparison to Rosie Co’s weighted average cost of capital).
    – Revenue and profit projections for the period until January 2012, checked for arithmetic accuracy.
    – A review of assumptions used in the projections, and agreement that the assumptions are comparable with the
    auditor’s understanding of Dylan Co’s business.
    Tutorial note: As the scenario states that Chien & Co has audited Dylan Co for several years, it is reasonable to rely on
    their cumulative knowledge and understanding of the business in auditing the revenue projections.

  • 第12题:

    (a) List and explain FOUR methods of selecting a sample of items to test from a population in accordance with ISA 530 (Redrafted) Audit Sampling and Other Means of Testing. (4 marks)

    (b) List and explain FOUR assertions from ISA 500 Audit Evidence that relate to the recording of classes of

    transactions. (4 marks)

    (c) In terms of audit reports, explain the term ‘modified’. (2 marks)


    正确答案:
    (a)SamplingmethodsMethodsofsamplinginaccordancewithISA530AuditSamplingandOtherMeansofTesting:Randomselection.Ensureseachiteminapopulationhasanequalchanceofselection,forexamplebyusingrandomnumbertables.Systematicselection.Inwhichanumberofsamplingunitsinthepopulationisdividedbythesamplesizetogiveasamplinginterval.Haphazardselection.Theauditorselectsthesamplewithoutfollowingastructuredtechnique–theauditorwouldavoidanyconsciousbiasorpredictability.Sequenceorblock.Involvesselectingablock(s)ofcontinguousitemsfromwithinapopulation.Tutorialnote:Othermethodsofsamplingareasfollows:MonetaryUnitSampling.Thisselectionmethodensuresthateachindividual$1inthepopulationhasanequalchanceofbeingselected.Judgementalsampling.Selectingitemsbasedontheskillandjudgementoftheauditor.(b)Assertions–classesoftransactionsOccurrence.Thetransactionsandeventsthathavebeenrecordedhaveactuallyoccurredandpertaintotheentity.Completeness.Alltransactionsandeventsthatshouldhavebeenrecordedhavebeenrecorded.Accuracy.Theamountsandotherdatarelatingtorecordedtransactionsandeventshavebeenrecordedappropriately.Cut-off.Transactionsandeventshavebeenrecordedinthecorrectaccountingperiod.Classification.Transactionsandeventshavebeenrecordedintheproperaccounts.(c)AuditreporttermModified.Anauditormodifiesanauditreportinanysituationwhereitisinappropriatetoprovideanunmodifiedreport.Forexample,theauditormayprovideadditionalinformationinanemphasisofmatter(whichdoesnotaffecttheauditor’sopinion)orqualifytheauditreportforlimitationofscopeordisagreement.

  • 第13题:

    (ii) Explain the ethical tensions between these roles that Anne is now experiencing. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Tensions in roles
    On one hand, Anne needs to cultivate and manage her relationship with her manager (Zachary) who seems convinced
    that Van Buren, and Frank in particular, are incapable of bad practice. He shows evidence of poor judgment and
    compromised independence. Anne must decide how to deal with Zachary’s poor judgment.
    On the other hand, Anne has a duty to both the public interest and the shareholders of Van Buren to ensure that the
    accounts do contain a ‘true and fair view’. Under a materiality test, she may ultimately decide that the payment in
    question need not hold up the audit signoff but the poor client explanation (from Frank) is also a matter of concern to
    Anne as a professional accountant.

  • 第14题:

    (b) Explain how growth may be assessed, and critically discuss the advantages and issues that might arise as a

    result of a decision by the directors of CSG to pursue the objective of growth. (8 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) Growth may be measured in a number of ways which are as follows:
    Cash flow
    This is a very important measure of growth as it ultimately determines the amount of funds available for re-investment by any
    business.
    Sales revenue
    Growth in sales revenues generated is only of real value to investors if it precipitates growth in profits.
    Profitability
    There are many measures relating to profit which include sales margin, earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and
    amortisation (EBITDA) and earnings per share. More sophisticated measures such as return on capital employed and residual
    income consider the size of the investment relative to the level of profits earned. In general terms, measures of profitability
    are only meaningful if they are used as a basis for comparisons over time or in conjunction with other measures of
    performance. Growth rate in profitability are useful when compared with other companies and also with other industries.
    Return on investment
    A growing return upon invested capital suggests that capital is being used more and more productively. Indicators of a growing
    return would be measured by reference to dividend payment and capital growth.
    Market share
    Growth in market share is generally seen as positive as it can generate economies of scale.
    Number of products/service offerings
    Growth is only regarded as useful if products and services are profitable.
    Number of employees
    Measures of productivity such as value added per employee and profit per employee are often used by shareholders in
    assessing growth. Very often an increased headcount is a measure of success in circumstances where more people are
    needed in order to deliver a service to a required standard. However it is incumbent on management to ensure that all
    employees are utilised in an effective manner.
    It is a widely held belief that growth requires profits and that growth produces profits. Profits are essential in order to prevent
    a company which has achieved growth from becoming a target for a take-over or in a worse case scenario goes into
    liquidation. Hence it is fundamental that a business is profitable throughout its existence. Growth accompanied by growth in
    profits is also likely to aid the long-term survival of an organisation. CSG operates in Swingland which experiences fluctuations
    in its economic climate and in this respect the exploitation of profitable growth opportunities will help CSG to survive at the
    expense of its competitors who do not exploit such opportunities.
    Note: Alternative relevant discussion and examples would be accepted.

  • 第15题:

    (ii) Explain why Galileo is able to pay the inheritance tax due in instalments, state when the instalments are

    due and identify any further issues relevant to Galileo relating to the payments. (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Payment by instalments
    The inheritance tax can be paid by instalments because Messier Ltd is an unquoted company controlled by Kepler at
    the time of the gift and is still unquoted at the time of his death.
    The tax is due in ten equal annual instalments starting on 30 November 2008.
    Interest will be charged on any instalments paid late; otherwise the instalments will be interest free because Messier is
    a trading company that does not deal in property or financial assets.
    All of the outstanding inheritance tax will become payable if Galileo sells the shares in Messier Ltd.
    Tutorial note
    Candidates were also given credit for stating that payment by instalments is available because the shares represent at
    least 10% of the company’s share capital and are valued at £20,000 or more.

  • 第16题:

    (b) The chief executive of Xalam Co, an exporter of specialist equipment, has asked for advice on the accounting

    treatment and disclosure of payments made for security consultancy services. The payments, which aim to

    ensure that consignments are not impounded in the destination country of a major customer, may be material to

    the financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2006. Xalam does not treat these payments as tax

    deductible. (4 marks)

    Required:

    Identify and comment on the ethical and other professional issues raised by each of these matters and state what

    action, if any, Dedza should now take.

    NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three situations.


    正确答案:
    (b) Advice on payments
    ■ As compared with (a) there is no obvious tax issue. Xalam is not overstating expenditure for tax purposes.
    ■ The payments being made for security consultancy services amount to a bribe. Corruption and bribery (and extortion)
    are designated categories of money laundering offence under ‘The Forty Recommendations’ of the Financial Action Task
    Force on Money Laundering (FATF).
    ■ Xalam clearly benefits from the payments as it receives income from the contract with the major customer. This is
    criminal property and possession of it is a money laundering offence.
    ■ Dedza should consider the seriousness of the disclosure made by the chief executive in the context of domestic law.
    ■ Dedza should consider its knowledge of import duties etc in the destination country before recommending a course of
    action to Xalam.
    ■ Dedza may be guilty of a money laundering offence if the matter is not reported. If a report to the FIU is considered
    necessary then Dedza should encourage Xalam to make voluntary disclosure. If Xalam does not, Dedza will not be in
    breach of client confidentiality for reporting knowledge of a suspicious transaction.
    Tutorial note: Making a report takes precedence over client confidentiality.

  • 第17题:

    4 (a) Explain the auditor’s responsibilities for other information in documents containing audited financial

    statements. (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    4 HEGAS
    (a) Auditor’s responsibilities for ‘other information’
    ■ The auditor has a professional responsibility to read other information to identify material inconsistencies with the
    audited financial statements (ISA 720 ‘Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements’).
    ■ A ‘material inconsistency’ arises when other information contradicts that which is contained in the audited financial
    statements. It may give rise to doubts about:
    – the auditor’s conclusions drawn from audit evidence; and
    – the basis for the auditor’s opinion on the financial statements.
    ■ In certain circumstances, the auditor may have a statutory obligation (under national legislation) to report on other
    information (e.g. Management Report).
    ■ Even where there is no such obligation (e.g. chairman’s statement), the auditor should consider it, as the credibility of
    the financial statements may be undermined by any inconsistency.
    ■ The auditor must arrange to have access to the other information on a timely basis prior to dating the auditor’s report.
    Material inconsistency
    ■ If a material inconsistency is identified, the auditor should determine whether it is the audited financial statements or
    the other information which needs amending.
    ■ If an amendment to the audited financial statements is required but not made, there will be disagreement, resulting in
    the expression of a qualified or adverse opinion. (Such a situation would be extremely rare.)
    ■ Where an amendment to other information is necessary, but refused, the auditor’s report may include an emphasis of
    matter paragraph (since the audit opinion cannot be other than unqualified with respect to this matter).
    Material misstatement of fact
    ■ A material misstatement of fact in other information exists when information which is not related to matters appearing
    in the audited financial statements is incorrectly stated or presented in a misleading manner.
    ■ If management do not act on advice to correct a material misstatement the auditors should document their concerns to
    those charged with corporate governance and obtain legal advice.
    Tutorial note: Marks would be awarded here for the implications for the auditor’s report. However, such marks, which are
    for the restatement of knowledge would NOT be awarded again if repeated in answers to (b).

  • 第18题:

    (c) Pinzon, a limited liability company and audit client, is threatening to sue your firm in respect of audit fees charged

    for the year ended 31 December 2004. Pinzon is alleging that Bartolome billed the full rate on air fares for audit

    staff when substantial discounts had been obtained by Bartolome. (4 marks)

    Required:

    Comment on the ethical and other professional issues raised by each of the above matters and their implications,

    if any, for the continuation of each assignment.

    NOTE: The mark allocation is shown against each of the three issues.


    正确答案:
    (c) Threatened legal action
    Ethical and professional issues
    ■ An advocacy threat has arisen as Bartolome and Pinzon are in opposition concerning the fee note for the 2004 audit.
    ■ If Pinzon’s allegations are true this may cast serious doubt on the integrity of Bartolome. Pinzon should be advised to
    take their claims first to ACCA’s Disciplinary Committee.
    ■ If Bartolome has indeed charged full air fares when substantial discounts had been obtained this could be due to:
    – Bartolome incorrectly believing this to be an acceptable industry practice; or
    – a billing error/oversight.
    In either case Bartolome should issue a credit note, although this may be insufficient to make amends and salvage the
    auditor-client relationship.
    ■ Bartolome may have legitimately claimed for full airfares if this was agreed in its contract (i.e. the terms of engagement)
    with Pinzon.
    Implications for continuation with assignment
    Unless the threat of legal action is amicably resolved very quickly (which is perhaps unlikely) Pinzon and Bartolome are in
    conflict. Bartolome cannot therefore be seen to be independent and so should tender their resignation as auditor for the year
    ending 31 December 2005 (assuming they were re-appointed and have not already been removed from office).

  • 第19题:

    (c) Explain the possible impact of RBG outsourcing its internal audit services on the audit of the financial

    statements by Grey & Co. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) Impact on the audit of the financial statements
    Tutorial note: The answer to this part should reflect that it is not the external auditor who is providing the internal audit
    services. Thus comments regarding objectivity impairment are not relevant.
    ■ As Grey & Co is likely to be placing some reliance on RBG’s internal audit department in accordance with ISA 610
    Considering the Work of Internal Auditing the degree of reliance should be reassessed.
    ■ The appointment will include an evaluation of organisational risk. The results of this will provide Grey with evidence,
    for example:
    – supporting the appropriateness of the going concern assumption;
    – of indicators of obsolescence of goods or impairment of other assets.
    ■ As the quality of internal audit services should be higher than previously, providing a stronger control environment, the
    extent to which Grey may rely on internal audit work could be increased. This would increase the efficiency of the
    external audit of the financial statements as the need for substantive procedures should be reduced.
    ■ However, if internal audit services are performed on a part-time basis (e.g. fitting into the provider’s less busy months)
    Grey must evaluate the impact of this on the prevention, detection and control of fraud and error.
    ■ The internal auditors will provide a body of expertise within RBG with whom Grey can consult on contentious matters.
    Tutorial note: Appropriate credit will be given for arguing that less reliance may be placed on internal audit in this year of
    change of provider.

  • 第20题:

    6 Certain practices have developed that threaten to damage the integrity and objectivity of professional accountants and

    the reputation of the accounting profession.

    Required:

    Explain the following practices and associated ethical risks and discuss whether current ethical guidance is

    sufficient:

    (a) ‘lowballing’; (5 marks)


    正确答案:
    6 CERTAIN PRACTICES
    Tutorial note: The answer which follows is indicative of the range of points which might be made. Other relevant material will
    be given suitable credit.
    (a) ‘Lowballing’
    Explanation of term
    ‘Lowballing’ is the ‘loss-leading’ practice in which auditors compete for clients by reducing their fees for statutory audits.
    Lower audit fees are then compensated by the auditor carrying out more lucrative non-audit work (e.g. consultancy and tax
    advice). Audits may even be offered for free.
    Such ‘predatory pricing’ may undercut an incumbent auditor to secure an appointment into which higher price consultancy
    services may be sold.
    Ethical risks
    There is a risk of incompetence if the non-audit work does not materialise and the lowballing firm comes under pressure to
    cut corners or resort to irregular practices (e.g. the falsification of audit working papers) in order to ‘keep within budget’.
    However, a lack of audit quality may only be discovered if the situation arises that the company collapses and the auditors
    are charged with negligence.
    If, rather than comprise the quality of the audit, an audit firm substantially increases audit fees, a fee dispute could arise. In
    this case the client might refuse to pay the higher fee. It could be difficult then for the firm to take the matter to arbitration
    if the client was misled. Thus an advocacy threat may arise.
    Financial dependence is a direct incentive that threatens independence. A self-interest threat therefore arises when, having
    secured the audit, the audit firm needs the client to retain its services in order to recoup any losses initially incurred.
    The provision of many other services gives rise to a self-review threat (as well as a self-interest threat).
    Sufficiency of current ethical guidance
    In current ethical guidance, the fact that an accountancy firm quotes a lower fee than other tendering firms is not improper,
    providing that the prospective client is not misled about:
    – the precise range of services that the quoted fee is intended to cover; and
    – the likely level of fees for any other work undertaken.
    This is clearly insufficient to prevent the practice of lowballing.
    Legal prohibitions on the provision of many non-audit services (e.g. bookkeeping, financial information systems design and
    implementation, valuation services, actuarial services, internal audit (outsourced), human resource services for executive
    positions, investment and legal services) should make lowballing a riskier pricing strategy. This may curb the tendency to
    lowball.
    Lowballing could be eliminated if, for example, auditors were required to act ‘exclusively as auditors’. Although regulatory
    environments have moved towards this there is not a total prohibition on non-audit services.

  • 第21题:

    (c) Identify and discuss the ethical and professional matters raised at the inventory count of LA Shots Co.

    (6 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) There are several ethical and professional issues raised in relation to the inventory count of LA Shots Co.
    Firstly, it was inappropriate of Brenda Mangle to offer the incentive to the audit juniors. As she is a new manager, it may be
    that she didn’t realise how the incentive would be perceived. Brenda should be informed that her actions could have serious
    implications.
    The offer could be viewed as a bribe of the audit juniors, and could be perceived as a self-interest independence threat as
    there is a financial benefit offered to members of the audit team.
    The value of the ten bottles of ‘Super Juice’ should be considered, as it is only appropriate for a member of the audit team to
    accept any goods or hospitality from the audit client if the value is ‘clearly insignificant’. Ultimately it would be the decision
    of the audit partner as to whether the value is clearly insignificant. It is likely that this does not constitute a significant threat
    to independence, however the offer should still be referred to the audit partner.
    Also, if the juniors took ten bottles of ‘Super Juice’, this could interfere with the physical count of goods and/or with cut off
    details obtained at the count. The juniors should therefore have declined the offer and informed a senior member of the audit
    team of the situation.
    There may be a need to adequately train new members of staff on ethical matters if the juniors were unsure of how to react
    to the offer.
    The work performed by the juniors at the inventory count must be reviewed. The audit procedures were performed very
    quickly compared to last year and therefore sufficient evidence may not have been gathered. In an extreme situation the whole
    inventory count may have to be reperformed if it is found that the procedures performed cannot be relied upon.
    In addition, the juniors should not have attended the audit client’s office party without the permission of the audit manager.
    The party appears to have taken place during work time, when the juniors should have been completing the inventory count
    procedures. The two juniors have not acted with due professional consideration, and could be considered to lack integrity.
    The actions of the juniors should be discussed with them, possibly with a view to disciplinary action.
    There may also be questions over whether the direction and supervision of the juniors was adequate. As the two juniors are
    both recent recruits, this is likely to be the first inventory count that they have attended. It appears that they may not have
    been adequately briefed as to the importance of the inventory count as a source of audit evidence, or that they have
    disregarded any such briefing that was provided to them. In either case possibly a more senior auditor should have
    accompanied them to the inventory count and supervised their actions.

  • 第22题:

    (c) Prepare briefing notes, to be used by an audit partner in your firm, assessing the professional, ethical and

    other issues to be considered in deciding whether to proceed with the appointment as auditor of Medix Co.

    Note: requirement (c) includes 2 professional marks. (12 marks)


    正确答案:
    (c) Briefing notes
    To: Audit partner
    From: Audit manager
    Subject: Issues to consider regarding appointment as auditor of Medix Co
    Introduction
    Medix Co has recently invited our firm to become appointed as auditor. These briefing notes summarise the main issues we
    should consider in deciding whether to take the appointment a stage further. My comments are based on a discussion held
    with Ricardo Feller, finance director of Medix Co, a discussion with the current audit partner, and information provided in the
    local newspaper.
    Legal actions and investigations
    There are several indications that Medix Co has a history of non compliance with law and regulations. The former finance
    director is claiming unfair dismissal, and in the past the local authority has successfully taken legal action against the
    company and has a current case pending. In addition, there have been two tax investigations in recent years hinting at noncompliance
    with relevant tax regulations.
    There are two problems for us in taking on a client with a propensity for legal actions and investigations. Firstly, the reputation
    of the company must be considered. If we become associated with the company through being appointed as auditor, we could
    be ‘tarred with the same brush’ and our own reputation also tarnished.
    Secondly, we could become quickly exposed to an advocacy independence threat, which clearly should be avoided. Our
    ethical status should not be compromised for the sake of gaining a new audit client. Mick Evans only ‘believes’ that the tax
    matter has been resolved by the directors, and we should avoid taking on a new client which is involved in an on-going
    investigation.
    Public interest
    The problems noted above are compounded by the bad publicity which the company is currently receiving. The local press
    contained a recent article discussing Medix Co’s past and current breach of planning regulations. Given the current level of
    public interest in environmental issues, and emphasis on corporate responsibility, it would seem that Medix Co has a poor
    public perception, which we would not want to be associated with.
    Potential liability to lender
    The company is currently negotiating a significant bank loan, and the lender will be using the audited financial statements to
    make a decision on whether to advance a loan, and the terms of any finance that might be advanced to Medix Co. This means
    that our audit opinion for the forthcoming year end will be scrutinised by the lender, and our firm is exposed to a relatively
    high risk of liability to a third party. Given that this will be our first audit, and the limited time we have available (discussed
    below) our firm may feel that the risk of this audit engagement is too high. Should the appointment be accepted, disclaimers
    should be put in place to ensure that we could not be sued in the event of the bank suffering a financial loss as a result of
    their lending decision.
    Timeframe. and resources
    It is currently the last month of the financial year. If we are appointed as auditor we need to work quickly to develop a thorough
    understanding of the business, and to begin to plan the assignment. We need to consider whether our firm has sufficient
    resources to put together an audit team so quickly without detracting from other client work currently being conducted.
    To make this matter worse, Mick Evans states that Medix Co likes ‘a quick audit’, and we need to consider how to manage
    this expectation, as first year audit procedures such as systems documentation, and developing business understanding tend
    to take a long time. We must be careful that the client does not pressure us into a ‘quick audit’, which could compromise
    quality.
    Medix Co operates in a reasonably specialist and highly regulated industry, so our firm should take care to ensure we have
    expertise in this industry.
    Potentially aggressive management style
    There are several indicators that the management may take a confrontational approach, such as the unfair dismissal claim
    brought against the company by the ex-finance director. In addition, the auditors prior to Mick Evans resigned following a
    disagreement with management. This history shows that we may find it difficult to establish a good working relationship with
    the management. As the company is owner managed the presence of a dominant managing director exacerbates this problem.
    Management bias
    There is incentive for the financial statements to be manipulated in order to secure bank finance. There is considerable risk
    of material misstatement which our firm may consider to be unacceptably high.
    Internal systems and controls
    The current auditors have found systems and controls to be poor, and management has not acted upon recommendations
    made by the auditors. Of course this does not mean that we should not take on the assignment – many companies have
    weak controls. However, if we did take on the appointment, we would not be able to rely on controls or use a controls based
    approach for the audit. We would need to take a substantive approach to the audit. One practical issue here is availability of
    staff to conduct the audit testing, as substantive procedures tend to be more time consuming than if we could have taken a
    systems based approach.
    Opening balances
    In all new audit assignments, work must be conducted to verify the opening balances. Given the possible fraud and poor
    controls described above, we would need to perform. detailed testing on the opening balances as there is a high risk of fraud
    and/or error in previous accounting periods. We may also wish to consider the competence of the previous auditors, who
    appeared to disregard potential fraud indicator (two cash books) and had only one audit client.
    Fees
    Mick Evans has made it clear that Medix Co’s management likes to keep a tight control on costs, and it may put pressure on
    us to charge a low audit fee. We need to bear in mind the risks associated with this engagement, as discussed above, and
    only take on this high risk audit if the audit fee is high enough to compensate.
    We should also consider the cash flow problems being experienced by the company. As a business we need to ensure that
    we only take on clients with a good credit rating, and it seems that Medix Co, operating with an overdraft, may not be able
    to pay our invoices.
    Indication of fraud or money laundering
    Surely the most serious issue to consider is that Jon Tate, the managing director, has kept two cash books. We need further
    detail on this, but it clearly could indicate a fraud being perpetrated at the highest level of management. The fact that he has
    maintained two cash books could indicate money laundering activites taking place, especially when considered in the context
    of an owner-managed business with overseas operations. If this were the ONLY problem discovered it could be deemed
    serious enough to bring to an end our appointment process. It would be reckless for our firm to take on a client where the
    managing director is a fraudster.
    Conclusion
    Further information is needed in many areas before a final decision is made. However, from the information we have gathered
    so far, it appears that Medix Co would represent a high risk client, and our firm must therefore be very careful to assess each
    problem noted above before deciding whether to proceed with the appointment.

  • 第23题:

    The finance director of Blod Co, Uma Thorton, has requested that your firm type the financial statements in the form

    to be presented to shareholders at the forthcoming company general meeting. Uma has also commented that the

    previous auditors did not use a liability disclaimer in their audit report, and would like more information about the use

    of liability disclaimer paragraphs.

    Required:

    (b) Discuss the ethical issues raised by the request for your firm to type the financial statements of Blod Co.

    (3 marks)


    正确答案:
    (b) It is not uncommon for audit firms to word process and typeset the financial statements of their clients, especially where the
    client is a relatively small entity, which may lack the resources and skills to perform. this task. It is not prohibited by ethical
    standards.
    However, there could be a perceived threat to independence, with risk magnified in the case of Blod Co, which is a listed
    company. The auditors could be perceived to be involved with the preparation of the financial statements of a listed client
    company, which is prohibited by ethical standards. IFAC’s Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants states that for a listed
    client, the audit firm should not be involved with the preparation of financial statements, which would create a self-review
    threat so severe that safeguards could not reduce the threat to an acceptable level. Although the typing of financial statements
    itself is not prohibited by ethical guidance, the risk is that providing such a service could be perceived to be an element of
    the preparation of the financial statements.
    It is possible that during the process of typing the financial statements, decisions and judgments would be made. This could
    be perceived as making management decisions in relation to the financial statements, a clear breach of independence.
    Therefore to eliminate any risk exposure, the prudent decision would be not to type the financial statements, ensuring that
    Blod Co appreciates the ethical problems that this would cause.
    Tutorial note: This is an area not specifically covered by ethical guides, where different audit firms may have different views
    on whether it is acceptable to provide a typing service for the financial statements of their clients. Credit will be awarded for
    sensible discussion of the issues raised bearing in mind other options for the audit firm, for example, it could be argued that
    it is acceptable to offer the typing service provided that it is performed by people independent of the audit team, and that
    the matter has been discussed with the audit committee/those charged with governance